Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (6) TMI 553

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -  Shri P.N. Kaul, learned Advocate, submitted that M/s. Bhopal Wires Pvt. Ltd. manufacture Electric Transformer and Conductors and avail of Modvat credit of duty paid on inputs; that on 12-11-97 they inadvertently took credit of Rs. 93,000/- instead of Rs. 16,740/-; that thus an amount of Rs. 76,260/- was taken in excess by them; that the Appellants after detecting the mistake themselves r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Asstt. Commissioner under the Adjudication Order dated 15-12-98. He also mentioned that the Asst. Commissioner has ordered that the duty short paid of Rs. 44,125/- is to be recovered in cash. The Asstt. Commissioner also imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,000/-; that on appeal, the Commissioner directed them vide Interim Stay Order No. 1034/99, dated 28-10-99 to deposit the entire amount of duty; that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Asstt. Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals) have only confirmed the demand of duty which was short paid by the Appellants at the time of clearance of goods and as such there is no infirmity in the Orders passed by them; that if the Appellants had deposited duty twice as claimed by them they should have claimed the refund of duty paid second time. The issue before the Tribunal is the confir....