Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2002 (8) TMI 766

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  The appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 967/CE/DLH/2001, dated 16-10-2001 of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. Under the impugned order, duty of Rs. 3,08,328.30 has been demanded from the appellants. Further, penalty of Rs. 4.75 lakhs has also been confirmed. 2. Ld. Counsel representing the appellants submitted that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at in the absence of any contumacious conduct by the appellants, penalty could not be imposed. According to him, a short-levy simplicitor does not attract penalty under the law. He also relied on the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of SIJ Electronics Computer Tech. Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Kochi - 2001 (129) E.L.T. 528 (Tribunal - Bangalore). 3. We have heard ld. DR also and perused the record....