2002 (8) TMI 766

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....isra, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  The appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 967/CE/DLH/2001, dated 16-10-2001 of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. Under the impugned order, duty of Rs. 3,08,328.30 has been demanded from the appellants. Further, penalty of Rs. 4.75 lakhs has also been confirmed. 2. Ld. Counsel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....duty short-levied. Ld. Counsel submitted that in the absence of any contumacious conduct by the appellants, penalty could not be imposed. According to him, a short-levy simplicitor does not attract penalty under the law. He also relied on the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of SIJ Electronics Computer Tech. Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Kochi - 2001 (129) E.L.T. 528 (Tribunal - Bangalore). 3. We ....