Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (1) TMI 498

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0 the appellants herein set up another factory at Nikol. During the relevant period they did not have a SSI registration certificate in respect of that factory. They got that factory at Nikol incorporated in their original certificate which had been issued by the SSI authorities in respect of their earlier unit at Udhav on 20-3-90. A dispute has arisen between the Revenue and the appellants whether the benefit of Notification 175/86-C.E. would be available to the goods manufactured in their second unit at Nikol manufactured and cleared during the period 1-2-90 to 19-3-90. 1.2 Revenue's contention is that there was no registration of the said factory at Nikol during the said period whereas the appellants' contention is that no registra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s that Para 4 requires registration of a factory with the SSI authorities, namely, Directorate of Industries or Development Commissioner, as the case may be. Proviso thereto gives relaxation in two different situations. Clause (a) speaks of relaxation from registration with SSI authorities if the clearances from the factory during the preceding financial year did not exceed Rs. 7 ½ lakh rupees or is not likely to exceed Rs. 7 ½ lakh in the current financial year. Clause (b) of proviso envisages a different situation, according to the learned Consultant, namely, a manufacturer who manufactures specified goods in a factory and who has been availing of the exemption under this notification i.e. 175/86-C.E. during the preceding fi....