2003 (9) TMI 477

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri N.K. Mishra, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The prayer in all the three Stay Petitions involving the same issue is to dispense with the condition of predeposit of the total duty amount of Rs. 2,05,216.00 (Rupees two lakh five thousand two hundred and sixteen) and the total penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakhs (Rupees one lakh) imposed up....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri B.J. Mookherjee, learned Advocate appearing for the applicants/appellants has also placed reliance upon the Tribunal's decision in the case of Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Limited v. C.C. Ex., Allahabad reported in 1998 (29) RLT 901 (CEGAT). In support of his above submission, he has also drawn our attention to the Board's Circular No. 246/80/96-CX., dated 1-1-1996. 2. Countering t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is the final product itself. 4. We have considered the submissions of both sides. Notification No. 67/95-C.E. extends the exemption in respect of the products which are used captively in the manufacture of the other final products in the applicants 'appellants'  factory. The gas which is allowed to escape in the atmosphere is not further used in the manufacture of any other item. The ....