2002 (5) TMI 784

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Heard both sides. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Non-alloy steel ingots and they were working under the Modvat Scheme. During the period July, 96 to November, 96, the appellant to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocuments. If any irregularity is done by the dealer then he is liable for penal action and the Revenue had not issued any Show Cause Notice to the dealer. Therefore, the Modvat Credit cannot be denied to the respondents. The contention of the respondents is also that after verifying the record maintained by the dealer, the Commissioner allowed the appeal. 5. In this case the allegation aga....