Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (11) TMI 445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. [Order per : C. Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Shri Kunal Shah, learned Advocate for the appellants states that the appellants are the agents for the master of the vessel "Sea Transporter" which ran aground off Fort Aguada, Goa in June, 1994 when a cyclone hit Goa coast. As the vessel had become a wreck it was sold to a ship breaking concern in Alang, Gujarat. For the wreck to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Coast at a depth of about 1,000 metres, no duty is payable on the same under Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. Exemption under Notification No. 133/87-Cus., dated 19-3-87 is also applicable. (2)      The demand of duty is hit by time-bar. (3)      The duty is also not payable in terms of the bond which required carrying the third section to A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Tri.) (5)      M.P. Steel Corporation v. CC, Rajkot - 1999 (112) E.L.T. 331 (Tri.) 3. Shri M.H. Shaikh, the learned DR argues that in the instant case, the ship was cleared for breaking from Goa and therefore, no exemption is available for the same. He also states that duty is payable by the appellants in terms of the bond executed by them. He supports the decision....