2002 (9) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mayank Holan and Rain Holan, C.A., for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - The issue involved in these two appeals, filed by the Revenue, is regarding liability to Central Excise duty in respect of tools, cutters and hobs manufactured by M/s. Gajra Gears Ltd. and sent outside for tin coating under Rule 57F(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 at the material time. 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The learned SDR, further, submitted that the impugned tools are also not exempted under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. as they have been cleared outside factory; that the provisions of Rule 57F(4) are also not applicable, and therefore, the duty is payable by them at the time of clearance of the tools to their job workers. 3. Countering the arguments Shri Mayank Holan and Ran Holani, C.A., s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion No. 67/95 is valid. 4. Rule 57F(4) at the relevant time authorised the manufacturer to remove the inputs as such or after they are partially processed at a place outside his factory for various purposes including refining, reconditioning, or carrying out any other operation necessary for the manufacture of the final products and return the same to his factory for further use in the man....