Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 572

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ribunal are that the petitioners requested for opening letters of credit in favour of Palmex Enterprises of Singapore for a sum of US dollars 205992.51 to cover the payment of consignment of PVC, C & F Bombay; that the respondent issued letter of credit in favour of the said seller for the said sum; that the letter of credit was transmitted to the seller through a negotiating bank authorising him under this letter of credit and to claim reimbursement by debiting the account of respondent-bank with their New York office; that the seller is purported to have shipped goods on 30-8-1979 and negotiated documents as required under the letter of credit on 31-8-1979 with the negotiating bank; that the negotiating bank made the payment and on receip....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rters under the letters of credit since importers disputed documents as discrepant and not in terms thereof. On refusal by the insurance companies to pay t he claims of the importers, they filed suits for recovery of insurance claim. It is contended that in the suits filed by importers against insurance companies and in the suits filed by the banks certain commonissues arise. Therefore, it is prayed matter that this should be re-trans- ferred to the High Court. The petitioners' request is strongly resisted by the respondent. 3. It is clear that article 139A of the Constitution is not attracted to cases of this nature as this is not a case where transfer of a case from one High Court to another High Court is sought for. It is also doubtfu....