2001 (10) TMI 920
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wmick, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - All the Miscellaneous Applications are for condoning the delay of about one month in filing the present appeals. 2. The appellants' case is that the Order-in-Appeal dated 31-1-2001 was issued on 2-4-2001 and received by the applicants/appellants on and around 9-4-2001 and was handed over by all of them to one Advocate, Smt. Sangita Sengupta ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sons only towards the end of July, 2001. The papers were, thereafter, returned to the applicants/appellants. She has also expressed her regret in the said affidavit. 3. Shri D.K. Bhowmick, learned J.D.R. for the Revenue opposes the condonation of delay, and submits that the applicants/appellants should have been more vigilant in pursuing their appeals. 4. In a rejoinder, Shri Chatt....
TaxTMI