1999 (8) TMI 828

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Salian, Advocates, on Gagrat & Co., for the Appellant. Shri Deepak Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. -  These three appeals involved the single issue and that is the includibility of the notional interest taken by the manufacturers from the buyers of their goods in the assessable value. These appeals are therefore disposed of in this common orde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the penalty. Hence the present appeal. 4. Before the lower authorities and before us the claims made are that the advance was taken as an established commercial practice, that there were counter guarantees to the Customers and that the composition of value of the goods was not influenced by the deposits taken. The relevant case law was also cited. 5.  We have carefully considered....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hudh Machines Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Meerut            [1999 (107) E.L.T. 76 (T) = 1999 (82) ECR 613 (Tribunal)] (2)     CIMMCO Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur [1999 (108) E.L.T. 804 (T) = 1999 (82) ECR 625 (Tribunal)] (3)     Punjab Power Generation v. CCE, Chandigarh [1999 (82) ECR 631 (Tribunal)]. 6A. In th....