Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1998 (9) TMI 565

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....va, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. -  For reasons recorded below, we dispense with the requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and proceed to dispose of the appeals themselves. 2. In these cases which arise out of the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi, a duty demand of Rs. 47,84,216/- has been confirmed on the firs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....omputers claimed by the appellant company to be part of trading activity and representing inter alia supply of software and peripheral devices. (c)      a demand of Rs. 18,26,751/- has been confirmed on parts of computers alleged to have been manufactured by the appellant company, rejecting their defence that parts were cleared by them as trading activity. (d) &nbsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any had to establish that the invoices raised from the office covered several items other than those manufactured in their factory and for this purpose, the appellants required to be supplied copies of the orders placed on it by the customers and all the invoices raised from the Sales office, which documents were resumed by the department and copies not made available prior to the passing of the i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1-3-1998 and once again on 21-4-1998 after the personal hearings held on 18-3-1998 and 20-4-1998. We also find that the Adjudicating authority has held that addition of peripherals and software to basic computers manufactured by the appellant company after matching compatibility amounts to manufacture, attracting levy of duty and therefore, it becomes all the more necessary for the appellant compa....