1997 (2) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Singh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of cold rolled strips falling under Chapter 72 of the erstwhile CET 1985 was availing Modvat credit on several inputs. The Additional Collector of Central Excise issued demand-cum-show cause notice stating that certain items claimed as inputs are not in the nature of inputs but are tools or parts of plant and ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rmed this order, the present appeal has been filed. 2. I will first deal with the case of Abrasive Grinding Belt falling under Heading 6802. There is no dispute that Abrasive Grinding Belt is used to remove layer of Iron oxide which gets deposited on the strips during the process of hardening and tempering of cold rolled strips, thereby giving shining to the strips and rendering them marke....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that these articles are not excluded by virtue of exclusion clause (i) of Explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It was held that while machinery and plant are excluded from the purview of the Modvat scheme, parts of machines are not so excluded. In Collector of Central Excise, Bolpur v. Durgapur Cement Works - 1997 (90) E.L.T. 197 (Tribunal), a Larger Bench held that while b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he reasoning which applies to Abrasive Belt would apply to these items also and it must follow that they are used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. 4. The lower authorities held that the objected articles are either tools or parts of machinery. If they are parts of machinery, going by the decision of the Larger Bench in Union Carbide India Ltd. case, they are not cove....