Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (1) TMI 1121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri A.K. Pandit, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Modvat credit of Rs. 54,688.00 has been disallowed to the appellants and penalty of identical amount has been imposed on the ground that the subsidiary invoices issued by the registered dealer were not proper documents inasmuch as the same were subsidiary invoices. 2. The appellants were, issued a show cause notice dated 20-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... such documents were permissible only upto June, 1994, he has denied the credit by observing that the invoices in question were issued in July, 1994 and the credit was taken in December, 1994. On the other hand, the appellants' contention is that the invoices in question have been issued by a dealer who was registered under the provisions of Rule 57GG. Inasmuch as it was initial period of registra....