1999 (1) TMI 436

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... B. Kanta Rao, Dr. M.V.K. Murthy, Ms. Asha G. Nair, Advocates, for the petitioners.   K. Ram Kumar, Ms. Shanti Narayanan and Ms. Asha G. Nair, Advocates, for the respondents.   -------------------------------------------------- Following its earlier judgment in Writ Petition No. 2425 of 1997, which has been dismissed on February 14, 1997 (G.S. Drugs and Pharmaceuticals v. Commercial T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....made by the 1996 Act was in exercise of its legislative powers by the State Legislature. The validity of the amendment had not been questioned either in the writ petition or even before us. That being the fact situation, the grievance made by learned counsel for the petitioner to the effect that the demand of differential tax based on the amendment of entry 37 could not have been made, is wholly m....