Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (10) TMI 845

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er dated 21st September, 1994 passed by the learned CIT(A)-XII. Ahmedabad wherein the learned first Appellate Authority has upheld the action of the AO in levying the penalty under section 271(1)(c) but allowed partial relief to the assessee with regard to the quantum of penalty which was imposed by the AO at an amount of Rs. 74,973. 2. Briefly the facts are that the assessee has filed a return o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee, the Tribunal vide its order dated 30-6-1997 in ITA No. 1099/Ahd./92 for assessment year 1988-89 sustained the following additions only : (a) Addition on account of GP Rs. 60,000 (b) Entertainment expenses Rs. 2,000 (c) Vehicle expenses on account of personal user by partner Rs. 6,000 (d) Depreciation Rs. 5,399 4. In the meanwhile the AO levied a penalty of Rs. 74,973 unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d on the decision of the Ahmedabad Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Patel Engineering Co. v. ITO [1988] 39 Taxman 236 in ITA No. 623/Ahd./85, order dated 20-11-1987. The learned DR supported the order of the CIT(A). 6. After hearing the parties to the dispute, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty as the additions sustained by the Tribunal are of such a nature wh....