Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (10) TMI 237

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ENT SMT. J. ANANDA LAKSHMI AND K. RANGA RAO, MEMBERS   M. Sudhakar Reddy for the Appellant. M. Krishna Mohan Rao for the Respondent. ORDER Sri A. Venkatarami Reddy, President - The respondent herein filed a complaint alleging that there is delay in sending 100 equity shares by Usha Rectifier Corporation to the complainants and thereby they lost the opportunity of making a profit. They, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ferred by the opposite parties. During the pendency of the appeals, we directed the opposite parties to pay costs of Rs. 300 each and permitted the respondents to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. The learned counsel for the appellants relied on the decision of National Commission in Usha Rectifier Corpn. Ltd. v. Dr. K. Dattatreya Rao [R.P. No. 208 of 1993, dated 8-10-1993] herein....