2002 (6) TMI 275
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Bagaria, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - As per the facts on record the respondents filed a classification list effective from 1-3-86 claiming that cellophane waste is not covered by any heading or sub-heading of Central Excise Tariff. The Asstt. Commr. passed an order on 29-11-86 classifying the goods under sub-heading 3920.21. The respondent....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ective period and will not operate for the period prior to the date of issuance of the show cause notice. Accordingly it was ordered that re-adjudication of the goods in question should be done by the Asstt. Commr. only for the prospective period i.e. w.e.f. 13-10-89, when the show cause notice was issued. 2. In de novo proceedings, the Asstt. Commr. passed the order holding the classifica....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ance Bill, 2000, which are to the effect that anything issued or served on any person under the provisions of Section 11A of the Act during the period commencing on end from 7th of November, 1980 and demanding duty of non-payment, short-payment etc., within a period of six months or five years, as the case may be from the relevant date shall be deemed to be and to always have been for the purpose,....


TaxTMI