Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2001 (12) TMI 484

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. [Order]. - Following some objections raised by the audit, and communicated to him, the Superintendent having jurisdiction over the factory of the respondent, wrote to it asking to reverse Modvat credit of Rs. 39,575/- which it stated was wrongly taken. He issued a reminder and subsequently, a letter, which is the subject matter of this appeal. In that letter, he has once again....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order against which an appeal lies to the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. The Counsel for the respondent relies upon the judgment of the Tribunal in Shree Synthetics Ltd. v. CCE - 1987 (29) E.L.T. 443 and in S.M. Energey Teknik and Electronics Ltd. v. CCE - 1989 (42) E.L.T. 700. 4. The latter decision is entirely irrelevant to the facts of this case. The other decision provides that a comm....