1981 (7) TMI 212

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ates, with him), for the respondent.   K.G. Bhagat and R.N. Poddar, Advocates, for the appellant.   --------------------------------------------------   The judgment of the Court was delivered by   PATHAK, J.-This appeal is directed against the judgment dated April, 3, 1980, of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposing of a writ petition filed by the respondent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f. The High Court noted the assurance and on that observed that the writ petition would become infructuous. But the High Court did not stop there. It proceeded to consider the question on the merits whether the aforesaid transactions constituted a sale for the purpose of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. The High Court held that they did not. Hence this appeal. &n....