2002 (3) TMI 488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order]. - The Tribunal vide its order dated 9-11-2001 observed in this matter that the amount of duty and penalty had not been deposited by the appellants for the purpose of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944; that there was no proof of deposit of duty and penalty, nor the appellants had filed any application for dispensing with the requirement of pre-deposit. The appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng. 3. This petition was listed for hearing on 25-2-2002 but the same stood adjourned for today at the request of Shri K.K. Anand, Advocate for the appellants. Today, when the matter is called, the appellants are not represented. Shri K.K. Anand, Advocate has however, sent a letter of even date pleading that he is unwell and the hearing may be adjourned to any other date. Since the matter ....