Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1989 (3) TMI 342

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Murthy and S. Venkat Reddy for the Respondent. JUDGMENT K. Ramaswamy, J. - The appellant is one of the directors of Rainbow Sea Foods P. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, under Certificate of Incorporation No. 9163 of 1982, dated January 16, 1982. It consists of the four first directors under article 33(a), viz., (i) C. Pattabhiraman ; (ii) C. Renie Fernando ; (iii) M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er vessel "Sunrise" was entrusted to C. Renie Fernando and M.A. Rajendran. The plaintiff-respondent No. 4 herein, C. Pattabhiraman, has stated in the plaint that, after taking over possession of the vessel "Sunshine", he was excluded from participation in the fishing operations, etc. As a result, C. Pattabhiraman laid O.S. No. 2 of 1987 for rendition of accounts. Pending the suit, I.A. No. 8 of 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant, contended that the suit itself is not maintainable in view of the fact that it is a company registered under the Companies Act and that, therefore, the interlocutory application also is not maintainable. It is unnecessary to go into that question at this stage. Suffice it to state that it is a matter to be gone into at the trial. It is found by the court below that the possession of the v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment as receiver of the property of a company formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1948, or preceding Companies Acts. Any such purported appointment is a nullity. This was stated following the ratio in Budgett v. Improved Patent Forced Draught Furnace Syndicate Ltd. [1901] WN 23. The reason stated therein was that, in case of companies, an accountant is very frequently appointed. It is o....