2002 (3) TMI 340
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ore, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri M.P. Singh, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - These applications seek waiver of pre-deposit of duty demanded and penalties imposed in adjudication Order 03/RM/2001, dated 4-10-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-II, Commissionerate. The duty demand is on account of the finding that the original a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... appellant's Counsel produced a statement showing that this trade mark is owned by several parties in respect of different products. The appellants contention is that since the brand name can be owned by several parties for several products, each one would be eligible for the exemption in respect of his goods. Much case law [1993 (65) E.L.T. 69; 1996 (85) E.L.T. 78; 1999 (111) E.L.T. 876] etc. hav....
TaxTMI