2002 (1) TMI 713
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ri R. Parthsarthy, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The respondents herein are manufacturing Paper and Paper Board. They were clearing their excisable goods on payment of duty after allowing special discount and weight difference discount to their customers. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise by order dated 3-1-96 confirmed the demand of Rs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at these were not known prior to the removal of goods from the factory. Hence, this appeal by the Revenue. 2. We have heard both sides. We find that the Commissioner has held, following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International, 1984 (17) E.L.T. 329 (S.C.) that there is no evidence led in by the department to show that special discount claim....