TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2002 (1) TMI 689
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....avindran, Advocate, for the Appellant. Smt. Radha Arun, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - The issue in all these appeals is common and therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The appellants are admittedly manufacturers of Soap having facility to process hydrogenation or hydrolysis, within the factory of production and were obt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....notice proposing to deny them the money credit availed, on the RBO, received for such processing from HLL. It also proposed to deny the amounts adjusted towards clearance of Toilet Soaps made by them and also proposed penalties. The jurisdictional officers confirmed the proposals as made in the show cause notice and imposed penalties. 3. The Commissioner (Appeals) came to a finding that : ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d be applicable and under Rule 57(P) no time limit had been prescribed and the orders of the Assistant Commissioners were to be held proper and penalties as determined under Rule 173Q were upheld......" 4. We have heard both sides and have considered the submissions made and perused the records and we find : (a) The contention of the learned SDR that the money cr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....001, dated 27-11-2001 of the WRB CEGAT. He also mentioned that the Order of the Commissioner, Aurangabad also on the same line granting the benefit of money credit scheme in their own case has attained finality as no appeals in that case was made. These appeals should be allowed with consequential benefit. The learned DR fairly conceded, that on merits the matter is fully covered by the Tribunal d....