Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2002 (1) TMI 633

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Appeal taken up for disposal with consent. 2. The appeal is against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing the appeal before him for failure to deposit the entire duty and penalty demanded from and imposed on the appellant in the order of the Dy. Commissioner. 3. The question before the Dy. Commissioner wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hese goods bear upon them the brand name of another person was entitled to exemption disqualified them from the notification. This decision was pronounced on 26-5-2000. However, the same issue was considered by the Larger Bench in Prakash Industries v. CCE - 2000 (119) E.L.T. 30. In its order on 22-5-2000, the Larger Bench held that where the manufacturer affixed a brand name of another person in ....