1984 (8) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....theRespondent. JUDGMENT Jitendra Nath Chaudhuri, J.-In all these matters, the two accused persons being the opposite parties herein, were discharged by the impugned orders dated March 28, 1979, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Calcutta. The complaints in the respective cases filed by the petitioner were that as directors they had failed to take all reasonable steps t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion 209(6)(d), which is a necessary prerequisite for fixing the alleged liability on a director. There must be an averment to show that "a director" is liable, excluding the other persons mentioned in section 209(6)(d) of the said Act. It is true that the impuged orders have not considered this particular absence of specific averment as contemplated under section 209(6)(d) of the said Act, but....