Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 644

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der]. - Appellant filed this appeal against the order in appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the benefit of Modvat credit was disallowed on the ground that the appellant had not declared the inputs in their declaration. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the appellants had declared RENOCID. F. Blue as input in their declaration and as per ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Meerut, reported in 2000 (121) E.L.T. 247 (T-LB) - 2000 (40) RLT 575 (CEGAT- LB). 3. Heard learned SDR who reiterated the finding of the lower authorities and submits that the specific description has not been given in the declaration and the inputs declared in the declaration are different than the inputs in dispute on which the credit has been denied. 4. Heard both sides. 5. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r publication in the Official Gazette. 2.  In the Central Excise Rules, 1944,- (a) in Rule 57G, after Sub-rule (10), the following Sub-rule shall be inserted, namely,- "(11) Credit under Sub-rule (2) shall not be denied that - (i)   any of the documents, mentioned in Sub-rule(3) does not contain all the particulars required to be contained therein under these rules, if such document ....