Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (5) TMI 733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....M. Kennedy, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The appellant entered into contract dated 21-12-1989 with the foreign supplier M/s. Metal Distributors (UK) Ltd., London for import of 150 MT of Special High Grade Zinc of 99.99% minimum purity at the agreed price of US $ 1440 PMT. Detailed specification of the goods were mentioned in the purchase order placed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... shipment of the remaining goods as stated in letter dated 24-7-1990 addressed by the local agent of the foreign supplier. The remaining goods under the said contract were thereafter shipped by the foreign supplier under invoice dated 29-7-1990 by charging the agreed contracted price of US $ 1440 PMT. In the invoice for this shipment at page 26 the number and date of the contract was also duly men....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....agaria, ld. Advocate that the undisputed fact on record that there was no scope to ignore the transaction value when the contract between the appellants and the foreign supplier was a genuine one and the foreign supplier was not related to the appellants. On the date of entrying into the contract the international market price of the goods was US $ 1440 PMT and that was also the quoted price in me....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....L.T. 3 (S.C.) = 1998 (25) RLT 1 ; 2000 (115) E.L.T. 100 (Tribunal) = 2000 (36) RLT 484 ; 2000 (37) RLT 573 ; 2000 (36) RLT 622 and a number of other decisions. The gist as all these decisions is that the invoice price cannot be discarded except on the strength of a clear evidence that the invoice is not genuine and does not reflect the transacted price. The burden of proving the charge of underva....