Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (11) TMI 540

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant. Shri A. Ashokan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.N. Srinivasan, Member (J)]. - This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the decision of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Adjudication), Mumbai who by the impugned order dated 7-1-1998 confirmed the duty amounting to Rs. 28,62,494/- and imposed penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/-. 2. The appellant is a manufacturer ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct namely plastic or glass feeding bottles classifiable under 3926.90 and 7015.00 without filing classification lists and without payment of duty. Therefore duty was claimed and penalty was imposed to be charged. We have heard Shri Gautam Doshi, C.A., for the appellant and Shri Ashokan, DR for the Department. It is found that the Tribunal recently in their judgment in the case of Dalmia Industries....