Home / 
2001 (3) TMI 422
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-2001<br>E/3562/98 - 409/2001<br>Central Excise<br>S/Shri G.A. Brahma Deva, S.S. Sekhon, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri S. Raghu, Advocate, for the Appellant. Smt. Radha Arun, SDR, for the Respondent. [....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....en considered by the Tribunal in the case of Karnataka Minerals & Manufacturing Co v. CCE Bangalore reported in 2000 (36) RLT 939 (CEGAT) wherein the benefit of notification was not denied because cer....