Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (4) TMI 264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - Vide the impugned order against the adjudication order passed by the Assistant Commissioner who rejected the importers' claim of assessment of disputed goods i.e. Demag Crane under Customs Tariff Heading 98.01 under project import and confirmed a duty demand of approximately Rs. 1.63 crores by holding that the goods fall for cla....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndia Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Mumbai, reported in 1994 (80) E.L.T. 759. The above decision was set aside by the Apex Court and remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision and the Larger Bench's decision of the Tribunal in the same case is reported in 2000 (122) E.L.T. 315. Having regard to the above, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order except to add that the Assistant Col....