Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (3) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tubings which were thereafter captively consumed in the manufacture of plastic bags. The lay flat tubings were printed with the customers' logo. The show cause notice alleged that printing was a process of manufacture and therefore the cost of printing should be added when computing the assessable value. The Assistant Commissioner relying upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of U.O.I. v. J.G. Glass Inds. Ltd. [1998 (97) E.L.T. 5 (S.C.) = 1998 (78) ECR 761], confirmed the demand and imposed the penalty. The Commissioner having upheld the order, the present appeal is before us. 3. Shri R.C. Saxena, learned counsel, fairly states that the cited order of the Supreme Court covers the issue but states that there was no cause for im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 5,000/-. 2. The appellants paid duty on lay flat tubings which were thereafter captively consumed in the manufacture of plastic bags. The lay flat tubings were printed with the customers' logo. The show cause notice alleged that printing was a process of manufacture and therefore the cost of printing should be added when computing the assessable value. The Assistant Commissioner relying upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of U.O.I. v. J.G. Glass Inds. Ltd. [1998 (97) E.L.T. 5 (S.C.) = 1998 (78) ECR 761], confirmed the demand and imposed the penalty. The Commissioner having upheld the order, the present appeal is before us. 3. Shri R.C. Saxena, learned counsel, fairly states that the cited order of the Supreme Court....