2001 (2) TMI 456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ravi Holani, C.A., for the Respondent. [Order]. - Revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal, whereby the Commissioner (Appeals), gave a finding that no suppression can be alleged against the respondents. Therefore, the demand is time-barred. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of plastic tanks and were availing the benefit o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ication list. As the respondents had not declared their intermediate product, the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) that the demand is time-barred, is set aside. 5. The respondents filed necessary declarations for availing the benefit of small-scale exemption and along with these declarations they explained the manufacturing process and while explaining the manufacture process they spe....