Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (7) TMI 536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The above appeal arises out of the order dated 13-7-1999 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh in terms of Rule 96ZQ(2) of the Central Excise Rules by which he has partly allowed the abatement claim of the appellants and then adjusted the abatement amount of Rs. 1,82,023/- for the period 24-12-1998 to 1-1-1999 again....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0-NB, dated 13-9-2000 under which the case has been remanded to the Commissioner. The appellants therefore, pray that the present impugned order may also be set aside and the case remanded for fresh decision. The learned DR reiterates the findings of the Adjudicating Authority. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We note that the appellants had applied for abatement for closure of t....