2000 (7) TMI 536
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The above appeal arises out of the order dated 13-7-1999 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh in terms of Rule 96ZQ(2) of the Central Excise Rules by which he has partly allowed the abatement claim of the appellants and then adjusted the abatement amount of Rs. 1,82,023/- for the period 24-12-1998 to 1-1-1999 again....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0-NB, dated 13-9-2000 under which the case has been remanded to the Commissioner. The appellants therefore, pray that the present impugned order may also be set aside and the case remanded for fresh decision. The learned DR reiterates the findings of the Adjudicating Authority. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We note that the appellants had applied for abatement for closure of t....