Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2000 (7) TMI 536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The above appeal arises out of the order dated 13-7-1999 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh in terms of Rule 96ZQ(2) of the Central Excise Rules by which he has partly allowed the abatement claim of the appellants and then adjusted the abatement amount of Rs. 1,82,023/- for the period 24-12-1998 to 1-1-1999 again....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0-NB, dated 13-9-2000 under which the case has been remanded to the Commissioner. The appellants therefore, pray that the present impugned order may also be set aside and the case remanded for fresh decision. The learned DR reiterates the findings of the Adjudicating Authority. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We note that the appellants had applied for abatement for closure of t....