2000 (3) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant. Shri K.M. Patwari, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The question for consideration in this appeal is whether chloracetamidoxime, a drug intermediate, is of the same class as chlordiazepoxide. The question arises because the appellant had claimed refund under Rule 173L of the duty paid on the former, which was used after its clearance of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uff Inds. Ltd. v. CCE - 1995 (77) E.L.T 518 to say that "class" not having been defined under the rule, its normal ordinary meaning must be taken into account. The decision cited by the appellant say that in the absence of definition in the rule of the terms "class" the meaning that is generally attributed to belonging to the same group or containing common characteristics must be considered. The ....