1999 (2) TMI 370
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Shri S. Sankaravadivelu, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Shri V.K. Asthana, Member (T)]. - These appeals are against common Order-in-Appeal Nos. 31 & 32/94(c), dated 8-3-1994 in which Order-in-Original Nos. 14/93 & 15/93 dated 23-12-1993 has been upheld. The issue concerns availability of duty exemption under Notification No. 170/89-C.E., dated 16-8-1989 for the periods 1-6-1989....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Industries as in 1987 (31) E.L.T. 442 which held that mere stranding of wires is not manufacture; (iii) Notification No. 170/89 is only clarificatory in nature as held by CCE, Chandigarh in the case of Aeron Steel Rolling Mills : (iv) and that the issue was covered by 1995 (80) E.L.T. 368 (T) - Apex Steels 1996 (8....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n No. 170/89 amended 202/88 to including bars twisted after rolling. (iv) Revenue contends that in view of there being nothing in 170/89 to show retrospective applicability, demands are correctly confirmed, while appellants argue on two main grounds :- (a) Notification No. 170/89 only sets right the suspected lacuna in 202/88. Hence it is only clarificatory and is to b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e was left open in the absence of material on record in that case. Large number of case-laws were examined before passing this judgment. Therefore, on the ground that Notification No. 170/89 is only clarificatory in nature and therefore having retro­spective effect, the ratio of this decision is clearly applicable to the facts of this case and hence the Order-in-Appeal impugned is liable to be....
TaxTMI