Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (1) TMI 374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....da, Asstt. Legal Adviser, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Revenue filed these applications for condonation of delay in filing the appeals. Admittedly, there was a delay of 30 days in filing the appeals. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The contention of the Revenue is that the delay in filing the appeals was due to administrative procedure involved in filing the appeals. The Hon'....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se held that spent nickel catalyst emerging as residue during the manufacture of Vanaspati is not excisable. 5. Heard both sides. 6. In this case the issue is whether "the spent nickel catalyst emering as residue during the manufacture of Vanaspati is excisable or not". The Tribunal in the case of Kusum Products v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta, reported in 1988 (33) E.L.T.....