2000 (1) TMI 374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l Adviser, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Revenue filed these applications for condonation of delay in filing the appeals. Admittedly, there was a delay of 30 days in filing the appeals. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The contention of the Revenue is that the delay in filing the appeals was due to administrative procedure involved in filing the appeals. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lyst emerging as residue during the manufacture of Vanaspati is not excisable. 5. Heard both sides. 6. In this case the issue is whether "the spent nickel catalyst emering as residue during the manufacture of Vanaspati is excisable or not". The Tribunal in the case of Kusum Products v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta, reported in 1988 (33) E.L.T. 639 (Tribunal) held that spent ni....