TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (8) TMI 286
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d Tarun Gulati, Advocate for the Respondent. S/Shri V. Lakshmi Kumaran and R. Parthasarthy, Advocates, for the Interested Parties. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - This appeal is directed against the imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of 'Sodium Cyanide' under notification No. 83/2000, dated 6-6-2000. The duty imposed is the difference between the amount mentioned in Column (4)....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ation also imposed duty, following the recommendations of the Designated Authority, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in rupee terms. 3. During hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants emphasised that their request for imposition of duty in rupee terms is in conformity with several decisions of this Tribunal on the subject. He relied on the following observations of the CEGAT in final order Nos. 6 to 1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the exchange rate." This decision was followed in final order No. 20 & 21/2000-AD, dated 2-2-2000 [2000 (112) E.L.T. 625 (Tribunal)] in appeal Nos. C/264/99-AD and C/332/99-AD with C/Stay/1383/99-AD with the observations as under :- "In BLA Industries & Others final order Nos. 6-15/2000-AD, dated 21-1-2000, we took the view that the Anti-Dumping Duty should be imposed on US $. Otherwise, the e....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be, and that would be in violation of the provisions of law relating to anti-dumping duty, as such duty cannot be in excess of injury margin or dumping margin, whichever is less. 5. The learned senior counsel for the Government has opposed the plea raised by learned counsel for the interested parties stating that an interested party in an anti-dumping appeal is in the position of an interven....