2000 (8) TMI 286
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ri Joseph Vellapally, Sr. Advocate and Tarun Gulati, Advocate for the Respondent. S/Shri V. Lakshmi Kumaran and R. Parthasarthy, Advocates, for the Interested Parties. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - This appeal is directed against the imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of 'Sodium Cyanide' under notification No. 83/2000, dated 6-6-2000. The duty imposed is the difference ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of Finance which issued the impugned notification also imposed duty, following the recommendations of the Designated Authority, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in rupee terms. 3. During hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants emphasised that their request for imposition of duty in rupee terms is in conformity with several decisions of this Tribunal on the subject. He relied on the following observ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion does not take place on account of changes in the exchange rate." This decision was followed in final order No. 20 & 21/2000-AD, dated 2-2-2000 [2000 (112) E.L.T. 625 (Tribunal)] in appeal Nos. C/264/99-AD and C/332/99-AD with C/Stay/1383/99-AD with the observations as under :- "In BLA Industries & Others final order Nos. 6-15/2000-AD, dated 21-1-2000, we took the view that the Anti-Dump....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....an the injury margin or dumping margin, as the case may be, and that would be in violation of the provisions of law relating to anti-dumping duty, as such duty cannot be in excess of injury margin or dumping margin, whichever is less. 5. The learned senior counsel for the Government has opposed the plea raised by learned counsel for the interested parties stating that an interested party i....
TaxTMI