Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (8) TMI 359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as per the provisions of the Export Import Policy 1992-97. Examination of the goods revealed that only 11 bales contained pre-mutilated rags while the remaining 67 bales valued at Rs. 9,02,427/- were found to contain serviceable non-mutilated used clothes. The value declared in the invoice i.e. Rs. 5,20,847/- did not appear to be correct transaction value. 2. The Adjudicating authority confiscated the goods with option to redeem the same on payment of a fine of Rs. 2,25,000/- and also imposed a personal penalty of Rs. 1,13,000/-. The Lower Appellate Authority set aside the Original authority's order and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication. The Adjudicating Authority, on remand, confiscated the entire consignment with option t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the present case which are entirely different. He submits that out of the 67 bales, only 20 bales contained cotton jeans which cannot be considered as useable for the manufacture of shoddy yarn but the remaining bales consisted of used garments which could be used for shoddy yarn manufacture, and should have been allowed to be released after mutilation. Regarding classification, he draws our attention to the Tribunal's order in the case of Mala Combers (Final Order No. C/105/94-D, dated 21-2-1994) wherein the Tribunal has set aside the classification of non-mutilated serviceable garments under CTH 63.09 and submits that, therefore, the importers claim of classification under CTH 63.10 should be accepted. He submits that the valuation of the....