1999 (10) TMI 242

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. Shri R.S. Sangia, JDR, for the Respondent.  [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - The captioned nine appeals were heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that M/s. Ratangiri Hathkargha Vastra Ltd., M/s. Ratangiri Ind. Ltd. and M/s. Subham Hathkargha Vastra Ltd. procured yarn from M/s. Shree Bhawani Texti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner held that the concession under Notification No. 53/91, dated 25-7-1991 was not admissible to the appellants and therefore, imposed penalties on the appellants. 3. Arguing the appeal Shri P. Mullick, ld. Chartered Accountant submits that the Notification in question had only two conditions namely that the yarn could be procured without payment of duty by registered co-op. society and that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by cheque by the registered co-op. society on their own account. He submits that there are a number of decisions of this Tribunal in which it has been held that payment by Pay Order/Demand Draft procured by issue of cheque on their own account is substantial compliance for payment by cheque under Notification No. 53/91, dated 25-7-1991. Ld. Chartered Accountant cited and relied upon the decisions ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red that yarn to powerloom owners and sometime sold the yarn as such. He submits that there is sufficient evidence on paper to show that the societies were registered as co-op. societies on paper only. He, therefore, submits that the conditions of the Notification and the intention behind that notification granting exemption were not fulfilled and therefore, the authorities below have rightly impo....