1999 (9) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ector and N. Singh, Consultant, for the Appellants. Shri M.M. Dube, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Vice President]. - In all these cases woollen/synthetic rags were confiscated because they were imported through Calcutta Port and the relevant P.N. No. 52/89 of ITC envisaged a restriction, which was also incorporated in OGL that imports of such rags could only be made through ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hese appeals be allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. 4. Learned JDR, Shri M.M. Dube submits that while the question of importation of synthetic woollen rags through any Port stands decided by Calcutta High Court in the aforesaid case of Kalindi Woollen Mills the question of non-registration of the appellants herein does not appear to have been settled. 5. We observe tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri J.K. Gupta for J.K. Shoddy Spinners, Shri R.P. Kumar for Sagar International and Shri Kamaljit Singh for Kohli Impex pointed out that registration with the Textile Commissioner is implied because the indents placed for importation of these goods has passed through the Textile Commissioner's office. Since we do not find any reference to these in the impugned orders or in the order-in-origina....