1999 (7) TMI 221
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - This case came up today for deciding the stay application. However, on hearing both the sides, we are of the opinion that the appeal itself can be disposed of. Accordingly, we dispense with the requirement of pre-deposit of duty amount and take up the appeal. 2. The relevant facts of the case are that the appellant....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to and relies on an order of the Tribunal (Order No. 360/94- NRB) reported in 1995 (78) E.L.T. 179. Such an order is not traceable as the reference is found to be not correct. 3. We have heard Shri J.M. Kenedy, ld. DR for the Revenue. He pointed out that the survey report had shown that full quantity of the goods had been unloaded and the appellants had accepted the survey report. He, theref....