Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (5) TMI 262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondents. [Order per : V.K. Ashtana, Member (T)]. -  In this Revenue appeal, the Order-in-Appeal No. KVV-147/91 BRD, dated 16-9-1991/25-9-1991 passed by the Collector (Appeals) has been impugned on the ground that Section 11A of the Central Excise Act cannot be super-imposed over Section 35E of the Act with an over-riding effect as both sections are independent of each other. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of principle of unjust enrichment. Aggrieved, Revenue appealed before the Collector (Appeals) leading to the order-in-appeal impugned. Ld. DR submits that in this order the ld. Collector (Appeals) has held that since no show cause notice was issued under Section 11A by the Department for recovery of refund allegedly given erroneously, therefore, no order could be passed on this appeal under Se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by law unless and until the said Revenue's appeal is preceded by a show cause notice under Section 11A. This, in our considered opinion, is an incorrect position of law. We find that the two Sections noted above exist and operate independent of each other. Therefore, the ld. Collector (Appeals) should have applied his mind and passed the order on merits of the case as provided for under Section 35....