Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (6) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....led by the party. Therefore, the same is not demandable. (c) An amount of Rs. 6318.00 is confirmed and demandable under Rule 57G. (d) Out of the total credit of Rs. 1430/- party has irregularly availed credit of Rs. 159/- and Rs. 417/- totalling Rs. 636/-. Thus I confirm the demand of Rs. 636/- against the party. The above demands are confirmed under Rule 57U of CER, 1944. I also impose a penalty of Rs. 1500/- on M/s. Threads India Ltd., Kampur Dehat under Rule 173Q of CER, 1944". 2. On appeal, ld. Commissioner (Appeals) held as under : "I have examined the case carefully, I find that the adjudicating authority has disallowed the credit on the ground that the appellants had not filed declaration of the impug....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....otor, flange, distance piece. The appellants submitted that they had described in their declaration of the goods as electric motors classifiable under Chapter heading 85.01; that electric motors classifiable under Chapter Heading 85.01 are capital goods; that electric motors are correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 85.01 and not under Chapter Heading 8448.90; that they have purchased these electric motors from M/s. Lohia Starlinger Ltd.; that they were not answerable if the manufacturer of the inputs had classified them under Chapter Heading 84.48; that misdeclaration by the manufacturer cannot be the basis for denying Modvat credit; that the appellants had made declaration and filed the same; that receipt of the electric motors fro....