Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (5) TMI 210

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... methanol were received under duty paying challan, the assessees caused weighment to be done. Credit was taken on the quantity actually received and not on the basis of the quantity shown in the duty paying documents. However, with effect from 9-5-1995, although the assessees continued to weigh and ascertain the actual quantity received, they took Modvat credit on the quantity shown in the duty paying documents. The department came across the data regarding weighment and observed that during the period September, 1995 to March, 1997, the duty leviable on the material short received amounted to Rs. 15,69,878. The assessees voluntarily deposited this amount on 11-4-1997. Even then, on 12-5-1998, the show cause notice was issued. The Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... speaks of "inputs ....... received in the factory." The Commissioner has held in the order that this rule indicates that the credit has to be restricted to the physical quantity of the inputs that is received. We also find that in terms of Rule 57A(4) the credit is allowed on the inputs used (emphasize supplied) in the manufacture of final product. These two provisions put together suggest that the Modvat credit can be taken on the actual quantity received in the factory which quantity is used in the manufacture of the final product. 8. We have also taken cognizance of the submissions made by Shri Parthasarathy. It is correct that where the goods are not subjected to weighment on receipt, the assessees would be permitted to take the ....