Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (8) TMI 358

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The Customs officer, on information, stopped a scooter driven by the appellant and seized Rs. 4.5 lacs Indian currency being carried on it. The appellant stated before the Customs officer on 6-10-1989 that he had been given the money by a stranger and that it was to be given to Manish. He said "I do know Manish indulges in smuggl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....no one has come to claim it. Therefore, the confiscation is justified. He relies on the decision of the Tribunal Pandurang Bagwan Patel and Anr. v. C.C.E. - 1987 (27) E.L.T. 713. 4. In this decision, the Tribunal has confirmed the confiscation of the currency seized from the appellant, based on the statement of Vasant Ramchandra Rassal, that he had no objection for the amount being confisc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eturn of the currency. This is also a distinguishing feature in this appeal. 6. The notice issued to the appellant did not specify any details of the contraband, the sale of which resulted in this currency or of any details of such sale. The statement attributed to the appellant that Manish, deals in smuggled goods cannot justify the conclusion that the currency was sale proceeds. The appe....