1998 (7) TMI 379

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri K. Kumar, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The respondents herein are engaged in the making of printing paste. The Department was of the view that the printing paste made by the respondents was a manufactured commodity classifiable under sub-heading 3204.29 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985, by application of Note 6 to Chapter 3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order of the C.B.E. & C., dated 21-4-1993". 2. We have heard Shri Satnam Singh, learned SDR and Shri K. Kumar, learned Advocate. 3. We find that in the appeal memorandum and the grounds of appeal, the challenge is only on the ground that the Collector (Appeals) has passed a vague conditional order which is devoid of any meaning. There is no challenge to the merits of the matter re....