1998 (6) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  The issue in these two Stay Petitions is the same i.e. determination of annual production capacity of Rolling Mill. 2. Shri Amit Avasti, the ld. Advocate appearing for the applicants, submits that the applicants had affected changes in some of the parameters which are considered necessa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Applicant afresh after giving them an opportunity of being heard in person. 3. Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, the ld. JDR opposing the stay of the order of the Commissioner, submits that the production figures submitted by the applicants themselves did not conform to their contention that the factors described for determining the annual production capacity had undergone drastic changes. He submi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ith the amendment to Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, determination of the capacity of annual production of Furnaces and Rolling mills was required to be done by the Commissioners concerned. In pursuance of this various notifications were issued for the purpose. The ld. Commissioner in the instant case undertook the determination of annual production capacity of the Rolling Mill. We not....