Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (12) TMI 452

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....kataramani, Member (T)]. - The appellants manufacture hand tools. They were operating under Modvat scheme under Rule 57A. They declared Inserts and Carbide Tips as inputs for the manufacture of their final products. Inserts and Carbide Tips are ultimately fitted by a process of brazing on the hand tools and become part thereof. The Department initiated proceedings against the applicant by issue ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Commissioner's order. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the inserts tool bits are themselves finished product and nearly 99% is cleared by the appellant as such on payment of duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) took the view that if they had been intermediate products, they would have been consumed in their entirety in the factory of the appellant itself. Since they are themselves final product an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... into existence, in the course of the manufacture of the final product and that such intermediate product are exempted from duty. They have contended that this rule specifically covers their case. 3. We have heard Shri D. Gurnani, the ld. JDR. We find that the matter in such a situation is fully covered by the provisions of Rule 57D(2) which has been relied upon by the appellants. The inputs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he provisions of Rule 57D(2) will get attracted. We also find that the position has been clearly elucidated in the Tribunal decision in the case of Collector of Central Excise v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. - 1992 (59) E.L.T. 168 (Tribunal) holding that Rule 57D(2) carves out and exception to the operation of Rule 57C, insofar as intermediate products are concerned. The two provisions should be read....