1997 (5) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri K.M. Mondal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member, (T)]. -  After hearing the stay application, we have decided that appeal itself can be disposed of for the reasons stated after waiving the pre-deposit of duty and penalty after hearing both sides. 2. Appellant is a manufacturer of photographic paper. Its manufacturi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of audit conducted in the factory. It was of the view that the Research and Development carried out was not connected with or related to the manufacture of the finished product. It, therefore, issued two notices proposing recovery of the credit taken. The appellant resisted notices and contended that part of the raw materials issued in the research formation was part of the finished products. It a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... there." The Commissioner has not given any basis for coming to this finding. The appellant, it is .......... does not appeal to have given details of how and to what extent production from the R & D was taken into account in RG. 1 register which should show the daily record of production. But once the submission was made before the Commissioner he should have discussed the matter and given a clea....